Designer’s Guide Community

ZYC

Guest

double balance mixer conversion gain
Aug 01^st, 2005, 8:14pm

Hi,

I am doing a double balance mixer. I found that there is 6dB difference of conversion gain while I use transcient or PAC to do simulation. For example, result from PAC is 12 dB and 6 dB from transcient. I am using ideal balun to convert single-ended port to mixer differential input and mixer differential output to single-ended output port. Can anybody tell me which result I should trust? Thank you very much.

BR,
ZYC

Back to top

IP Logged

uncle_ezra Community Member Offline Posts: 90	Re: double balance mixer conversion gain Reply #1 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 12:33am Well transient is always the most reliable simulation, but I am astonished by the difference. What accuracy are you running your PSS? Conservative? I heard there is some dB difference between conservative, moderate and liberal?
Back to top	IP Logged

pancho_hideboo

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1424
Real Homeless

Re: double balance mixer conversion gain
Reply #2 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 2:45am

Hi.

What definition of gain do you use each for PSS/PAC and Transient Analysis ?
These are surely same ? � ???

The definition of Voltage gain of PAC direct plot form is "Vout/(E/2)",
here E means open voltage of signal source.
It is not "Vout/Vin", here Vin means voltage at an input node of DUT.

Do you use gain definition of "Vout/Vin" for Transient Analysis ?
If S11 is far from matched, "Vout/(E/2)" and "Vout/Vin" are quite different.

Tongue

Back to top

Kita━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!!
http://www7.plala.or.jp/ungeromeppa/flash/kita.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjIxGh55bMM&feature=related

IP Logged

ZYC Guest	Re: double balance mixer conversion gain Reply #3 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 3:44am I have tried three accuracy defaults in PSS. The conversion gain is very close to each other. I am using "Vout/Vin" as transient gain. My friend told me his PAC result was the same as transient result in single balance mixer simulation.
Back to top	IP Logged

ZYC Guest	Re: double balance mixer conversion gain Reply #4 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 3:46am I have tried three accuracy defaults in PSS. The conversion gain is very close to each other. I am using "Vout/Vin" as transient gain. My friend told me his PAC result was the same as transient result in single balance mixer simulation.
Back to top	IP Logged

pancho_hideboo

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1424
Real Homeless

Re: double balance mixer conversion gain
Reply #5 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 4:23am

Hi.

For PAC, do you use gain definition of "Vout/Vin" which is same definition for Transient Analysis ?

For simulator accuarcy or difficulty , there is no difference between single or double balanced as far as it can converge appropriately.

In general, the ambiguity in gain definition or input voltage definition �causes discrepancy between simulation results.

Back to top

Kita━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!!
http://www7.plala.or.jp/ungeromeppa/flash/kita.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjIxGh55bMM&feature=related

IP Logged

Andrew Beckett

Senior Fellow

Offline

Life, don't talk to
me about Life...

Posts: 1742
Bracknell, UK

Re: double balance mixer conversion gain
Reply #6 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 5:13am

Problems tend to occur when people have ports which aren't matched, and then put (say) "1" as the value on the port, and expect the PAC output to give them gain. If you want voltage gain, look at the difference in dB between the two nodes (at the appropriate frequencies). It should tie up pretty well between transient and PAC, provided that the mixer is responding linearly (i.e. well below the 1dB compression point).

Regards,

Andrew.

Back to top

IP Logged

Eugene

Senior Member

Offline

Posts: 262

Re: double balance mixer conversion gain
Reply #7 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 11:00am

Some simple things to check:

1. Are you sure your transient analysis has reached steady state? If you only monitor peak voltage and the transient analysis has not reached stated state, your results will be misleading.

2. Are you sure you selected the right sideband options in your PAC analysis. I frequently require several attempts before I get it right.

3. A factor of EXACTLY 6 dB is very suspicious. It usually arises out of something simple like computing gain as the ratio of an output peak voltage to an input peak-to-peak voltage. I assume your transient and PAC circuits are one in the same so that you do not have a matching issue. For example, the port has a factor of two such that you only get the specified output when it drives a matched load. But if the circuits are the same, that should not be the issue.

4. Do you more than one PAC source? For example, if you cut and paste a source with PACmag=1, it is easy to forget that you now have two PAC sources when you meant to have only one. Both will contribute to the output.

Back to top

IP Logged

ZYC Guest	Re: double balance mixer conversion gain Reply #8 - Aug 2^nd, 2005, 6:45pm Yes, the problem is caused by unmatched input. My input port resistance is 50ohm. It is much smaller than mixer input impedance. So vin is almost equal to E(not E/2). That is why around 6dB difference. Thank you very much. :) BR, ZYC
Back to top	IP Logged

ellarguero

New Member

Offline

Posts: 9

Re: double balance mixer conversion gain
Reply #9 - Feb 6^th, 2012, 4:10am

hello
i have a similar probleme, but i have a suspicious 3ds difference
i have a dut which is an ideal pvccs2 ( it does Iout=gmVin�)
at the input and output there are 50 ohm ports
from transient conversion gain is equal to 28dB*
from PSS/PXF i get 31 dB, 3 dB higer than transient , please give me a hint to find the source of this discrepancy

Back to top

IP Logged