I have a verilogA model which I use. The output is strobed and saved in a file for further matlab processing. Recently we switched from ic5033 to ic5141. When I run the exact same model under ic5033 I obtain difference performance results than when simulated under ic5141. The model is a sigma delta modulator. The performance difference between the two is 30dB in SNR!!

When looking at the terminal output the only difference I can see is that ic5141 spectre compiles a model named ahdlcmi and that it gives me a warning saying that absdelay() does not account for phase shift in small-signal analysis.

Could it be absdelay? But when I replace it with a sample and hold, i.e. zi_nd(signal, {1},{1}, period, period), it will not give the warning. However, that SNR performance will be the same.

What is the ahdlcmi module library?

Any ideas?

Thanks

Verilog-A is now (at least partially) compiled to C,and then this is compiled (by gcc) and linked in as a shared library (to increase performance). I doubt whether this would make a difference, but you can check by doing:

Code:

setenv CDS_AHDLCMI_ENABLE NO 

if using csh, or:

Code:

CDS_AHDLCMI_ENABLE="NO"
export CDS_AHDLCMI_ENABLE 

if using sh/ksh/bash.

Do this before running spectre - or if using ADE, do it before starting DFII.

I doubt however whether this would make a difference. What it does is turn off model compilation.

Most likely it is a tolerance issue, or something like that, as
Baolin suggested. Either that or you've accidentally changed something else!

If you find a difference with the model compilation stuff, report it to customer support. Similarly if you can't find the difference, customer support should be able to help you (but you'll need to give the testcase).

Regards,

Andrew.

Some other questions, how are you windowing the data in post processing?
The output spectrum of an Sigma-Delta is very sensitive if the Rectangular
window is used.  Also how are you strobing the output of the Sigma-
Delta modulator? Are you using the strobe function or are you using
an external zvcvs source? Using the external zvcvs source would eliminate
the need for the sample and hold and also eliminate interpolation error
in the output. Unfortunately it does not reduce the data set size so it might
be good to strobe the output of the zvcvs source.

                                                                     Sheldon

Another thing to check is whether the absdelay has accidentally caused some difference in transient time-stepping. You can ompare the number of accepted time steps in the log files.

Baolin

Is there some known difference between sqrt(x) and pow(x,0.5)? I am fairly sure sqrt(x) is actually
sqrt(x+epsilon) where epsilon is some really small number. You see the effect of epsilon in an AC analysis biased at or near x=0. I don't recall if pow(x,0.5) also has epsilon. Epsilon was added to avoid convergence difficulties near x=0. Is there another difference besides epsilon?

I ran into the problem while using baseband equivalent models of RF amplifiers. I had used the sqrt function to compute the amplitude of the complex envelope. I tried computing gain with zero input and noticed zero gain.  In my appication, even 1e-9 was large since it was relative to zero. I've since switched to a Cartesian approach that avoids the entire issue. Anyway, thanks for the information Geoffrey.

My version of spectre prints out a list of important parameter values...

I'd suggest you look through "spectre -help options" and look for all the tolerances.  Cut them by an order of magnitude (or two) and see what happens.