The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 2nd, 2024, 7:33am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
CG and matching about mixer (Read 3212 times)
steven_l
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3

CG and matching about mixer
Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am
 
I am confused about conversion.

1
http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1122952471/2#2

If I setup E in port, then in reality, the signal at the gate of the mosfet is 2E.

I wonder if the E means PAC mag of RF POIRT in cadence?

Why the gate of the mosfet is 2E? Assume the port is ac coupling to the gate and there is no match net work, which means signal at the right side and left side are different. One side is E, the other side is 2E.

Why?
how can a port with E can generate a 2E at the gate of mosfet?

Then Voltage gain of transient means Vout/Vin= Vout/E.
Why not Vout/2E?
Because the signal at gate is 2E~~

2
There are many voltage definition:
For      PAC, PXF and Pniose, it is Vout/(E/2)
For transient and PSP, it is Vout/Vin, Vin is the signal voltage at a input node of DUT.

I wonder if the input node means the + terminal of port or vsin?

It seems that Vout/(E/2) is used for power based system, while Vout/Vin is for voltage based system or for low frequency.

As mixer is a      RF block, it seems that the voltage conversion gain  Vout/(E/2)is correct. Say, PAC plot in Direct Plot is correct.
But why “http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1237656418/0” says , CG plot from Direct Plot is wrong?

3
I parallel a 50 Ohm resistor with PR port and LO port, respectively.
This is for broadband resistive matching.
But as http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1194006190 says, 50 Ohm does not one part of circuit. So the stimulation results are not correct.
But in reality,without 50 Ohm resisitor how can I realize broadband match?
My mixer is resistive mixer, input signal from tens of MHz to 2GHz. Can I use off-chip match network? But the imput impedance is time variant. How can I match the input impedance to 50Ohm for such a wideband?


Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: CG and matching about mixer
Reply #1 - Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am
 
You use "E" as half of open circuit voltage of port.
Your usage of symbol "E" is not common.

Generally "E" is used like following.
See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1122952471/2#2
"E" is used as an open circuit voltage of port generally.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
I wonder if the E means PAC mag of RF POIRT in cadence?
Yes, if you mean "E" as half of open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
how can a port with E can generate a 2E at the gate of mosfet?
This is because an input impedance of gate is very large.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
Then Voltage gain of transient means Vout/Vin= Vout/E.
No.
Conventional voltage gain is Vout/Vin not Vout/E, even if you mean "E" as half of open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
Why not Vout/2E?
Because the signal at gate is 2E
If an operation frequency is fairly low, Vout/Vin is almost same as Vout/(2E), if "E" is half of open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
I wonder if the input node means the + terminal of port or vsin?
Yes, Vin is a voltage measured at that node.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
As mixer is a RF block, it seems that the voltage conversion gain Vout/(E/2) is correct.
Say, PAC plot in Direct Plot is correct.
No, you are misunderstanding.
Both gains are correct.
But Vout/Vin is more useful and practical gain definition than Vout/(E/2) in IC chip.
Here "E" is an open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
But why http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1237656418/0 says , CG plot from Direct Plot is wrong?
You are misunderstanding.
manfred wants to get Vout/Vin. But he gets Vout/(E/2) using "Direct Plot". I mean this is not correct.
Here "E" means an open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
I parallel a 50 Ohm resistor with PR port and LO port, respectively.
What do you mean by "PR port" ?

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
But as http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1194006190 says, 50 Ohm does not one part of circuit.
So the stimulation results are not correct.
You are misunderstanding.
For your case, 50ohm resistors are part of your circuit. So the simulation results are correct.

See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1207009725/1#1



The followings are general notes for you.

- Always describe correct tool's name and vendor's name which you use as tool or simulator.
- Don't do multiple posts which are same content.
- Don't request source code or behavioral model without any efforts.
- There are many simulators which have analyses called as PSS, PAC and Pnoise.
- Describe in detail with using correct terminologies.
- Warnigns are different from Errors.
- ADS is not name of simulator.
- There is no tool which name is Cadence.
- Don't use Direct Plot of Cadence ADE blindly without knowing definition.
- All gains in Direct Plot of Cadence ADE are "right", "true" and "practical" voltage gain.
- Don't mix up Simulation with Post Processing. They are completely different phase.
- MATLAB are different from Simulink.
- Learn measurements using actual instruments. Not "EDA Tool Play
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Jun 28th, 2010, 1:16pm by pancho_hideboo »  
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
steven_l
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 3

Re: CG and matching about mixer
Reply #2 - Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am
 
pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
how can a port with E can generate a 2E at the gate of mosfet?
This is because an input impedance of gate is very large.


I can not understand.
In my opinion, if a RF port in cadence has E in PAC mag, it mean the port generate E Vp-p voltage to the gate of mosfet through AC capacitor.

In deed , the input impedance is very large. But why it is 2E instead of 3E or 4E. I can not understand it through intuition. Can I get the result from mathematical derivation?

pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
Then Voltage gain of transient means Vout/Vin= Vout/E.
No.
Conventional voltage gain is Vout/Vin not Vout/E..


Which net represents Vin?
I am sorry. I do not know why I can not upload picture. So I can not describe my question clearly.
So I can only describe my circuit in following words.
Apploogized

Commonly, Vsin series a  AC capacitor. And the AC capacitor series the gate of mosfet.
Does Vin net mean the net between AC capacitor and gate of the mosfet?

While port is made of a ideal source and a internal resistor. If PAC mag of the port is E, the internal resistor is 50 Ohm. I series the port and gate of mosfet through a AC capacitor. Then signal at the gate of mosfet is 2E( I can not understand until now).

In these two cases, source signal means the signal at the gate of the mosfet.
And the gate net is the input net. Also the gate signal is the input signal.

pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
As mixer is a RF block, it seems that the voltage conversion gain Vout/(E/2) is correct.
Say, PAC plot in Direct Plot is correct.
No, you are misunderstanding.
Both gains are correct.
But Vout/Vin is more useful and practical gain definition than Vout/(E/2) in IC chip.



You say Vout/Vin is more useful and practical than Vout/(E/2) in IC chip.

I wonder does the CG in many IEEE paper represent Vout/Vin or Vout/(E/2)?

In my receiver, LNA, mixer and IF filter are all off chip block. The LNA and filter need to buy. The mixer is need to design in IC. So in the case Vout/(E/2) is more useful?



pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
I parallel a 50 Ohm resistor with PR port and LO port, respectively.
What do you mean by "PR port" ?



Sorry PR is a mistake. I means 50 Ohm resistor paralleling with RF PORT and LO PORT.

pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
But as http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1194006190 says, 50 Ohm does not one part of circuit.
So the stimulation results are not correct.
You are misunderstanding.
For your case, 50ohm resistors are part of your circuit. So the simulation results are correct.

See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1207009725/1#1



You say 50 Ohm resistors are part of my circuit.
Yes, mixer is a wideband mixer.
But I do not want this resistor as possible as I can. It seem than match net work is the only way. But for a wideband, it may be a little difficult work. Any other good method?

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: CG and matching about mixer
Reply #3 - Jun 28th, 2010, 10:27am
 
See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1231076499/11#11

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am:
In my opinion, if a RF port in cadence has E in PAC mag, it mean the port generate E Vp-p voltage to the gate of mosfet through AC capacitor.
No, it is 4E[Vpp], if you mean "E" as half of open circuit voltage of port.
But it is not appropriate to argue Vpp since PAC is a small signal analysis.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am:
In deed , the input impedance is very large.
But why it is 2E instead of 3E or 4E. I can not understand it through intuition.
Can I get the result from mathematical derivation?
Simply confirm port of 50ohm with load of 1Tohm.
If you do, you can understand.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am:
Which net represents Vin?
See the following again.
pancho_hideboo wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 8:06am:
steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 7:59am:
I wonder if the input node means the + terminal of port or vsin?
Yes, Vin is a voltage measured at that node.


steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am:
You say Vout/Vin is more useful and practical than Vout/(E/2) in IC chip.
I wonder does the CG in many IEEE paper represent Vout/Vin or Vout/(E/2)?
Generally Vout/(E/2) is not used.
Here "E" means an open circuit voltage of port.

steven_l wrote on Jun 28th, 2010, 10:11am:
In my receiver, LNA, mixer and IF filter are all off chip block.
The LNA and filter need to buy.
The mixer is need to design in IC.
So in the case Vout/(E/2) is more useful?
No, you should use S21.
See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1266168115/1#1


I'm not kind and patient enough for explaining these too basic issues.
If you can not still understand, other people who is very kind and patient will help you.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: Jun 28th, 2010, 1:15pm by pancho_hideboo »  
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.