The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Models in Minutes
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines. Dec 15th, 2018, 11:44pm
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterPM to admin  
 
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
device local mismatch (Read 1313 times)
dog1
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 48

device local mismatch
Feb 05th, 2018, 9:48am
 
Hello, I'd like to ask if device local mismatch is on the order of +-10% or +-0.1%.

I saw many PDK provide description of mismatch of analog devices (poly cap, resistor and transisor current) on the order of +-10%. For example, one document I have now states around +-10% of transistor current mismatch for 3 sigma, when Vg=Vdd.

However, when I search for PRNU (Photo Response Non Uniformity) in google, I noticed that the PRNU is normally on the order of 0.1%. I attached one table I found with google as an example. As I understand, PRNU is the mismatch of the response from different pixels in a pixel arrary in image sensor. This include many mismatches, such as mismatchs between pixels, mismatch between floating diffusion capacitance, mismatch between readouts chains... How come that the mismatch here is so small compared with the device mismatchs?

Can anybody give me some hint? Thanks.

Chen
Back to top
 

hub_04a_07_table01.gif
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 745

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #1 - Feb 5th, 2018, 1:11pm
 
Chen,

   It is possible that they are talking about pixel as a circuit not as a
device. At the circuit level, the circuit may compensate for the device
variation.

                                                                         Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Tako
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 53

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #2 - Feb 5th, 2018, 2:44pm
 
You should stay to what is claimed by the foundry. In case of doubts ask them directly. As a customer you should have a foundry support.

In foundry's documentations there are many reports for mismatch. You have 3 sigma vs 1/sqrt(A) plots, where A is arena of a given device (transitor, resistor etc.). Hence you may see what is Id or Vth mismatch for given transistor's size.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
dog1
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 48

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #3 - Feb 6th, 2018, 3:43am
 
Hello Sheldon and Tako,

Thanks for your answers.

Sheldon, I think they are indeed talking about pixel as circuit. But I've never seen a image sensor able to compensate for the gain mismatch from the pixel, which is directly related to the mismatch between floating diffusion capacitance. And the PRNU should be even larger than this as it contains also gain mismatch from other devices in the readout chain. That's why I am confused how it can be so low.

Tako, the document I have at hand doesn't say how the 3 sigma is measured, if it is die to die, wafer to wafer, batch to batch, nor if it is local or global on the wafer. I don't have the previous PDKs now. But Seeing from the small PRNU, it seems that the local mismatch should be much smaller than 10% order. Thus I was confused. I will ask the fab as you suggusted.

Thanks very much again for both of your comment.

BR
CHEN
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Tako
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 53

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #4 - Feb 6th, 2018, 4:05am
 
I opened the document for the technology I have currently and for Vth mismatch (the way of measuring is described in the document, so you will know whether it is local or global, but this one is local) for a transistor it start form ~30 mV for one sigma and goes as low as single mV.

The same for Ids mismatch which is in %. Starts from ~6% for 1 sigma and goes to 0.X %.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Geoffrey_Coram
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1939
Massachusetts, USA
Re: device local mismatch
Reply #5 - Feb 6th, 2018, 8:55am
 
And typically the mismatch is worse for small (eg, minimum-geometry) devices, but probably they use larger devices for the pixel array.
Back to top
 
 

If at first you do succeed, STOP, raise your standards, and stop wasting your time.
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
dog1
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 48

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #6 - Feb 7th, 2018, 2:41am
 
Thanks very much for all your answers.

Geoffrey_Coram, I think pixel is indeed large, often on the order of serveral um. The floating diffusion, however, which is related to the gain of a pixel, is normally smaller. It is not too much largerer from a well capacitor. That's why I was guessing that it should not be orders of magnitude smaller than normal device mismatch. I could be wrong. though. I also noticed that in Tako's reply, 1 sigma can indeed goes to 0.X% for Ids. Maybe this indicates that for um order size device 0.X% order mismatch is normal.

Tako, this is very helpful. Although I still don't understand how PRNU is normally so small, I have confidence that I am comparing apple to apple (local mismatch to local mismatch). I will, as you suggusted, try to find answers from some fab staffs. Maybe they have relavent image sensor knowledge to clear my confusion.

Thanks again.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Tako
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 53

Re: device local mismatch
Reply #7 - Feb 7th, 2018, 6:21am
 
Happy to help you in some way. Smiley

When you find out something, please share.

Good luck!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Trouble viewing this site? Copyright © 2002-2018 Designer's Guide Consulting. 'Designer's Guide' is a registered trademark of Designer's Guide LLC. All rights reserved.

Our colleges are not as safe as they seem. Sexual assault is pervasive and the treatment of the victim by the adminstration is often as damaging as the assault: Campus Survivors, Campus Survivors Forum.

Some of our other sites that you might find useful: Avendesora, Inform and QuantiPhy.