The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 19th, 2024, 5:47pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Discrepancy between liberal and moderate in the simulation of a SC delta sigma (Read 1577 times)
polyam
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 78

Discrepancy between liberal and moderate in the simulation of a SC delta sigma
Dec 24th, 2017, 5:55pm
 
Hi,

I am trying to simulate a 2nd order SC delta-sigma modulator. Whole blocks are implemented through either macro-models or Verilog-A modules. Specifically, OTAs are modeled with macro models and switches are the Verilog-A modules. The sampling frequency is fs= 5.12 MHz and BW=20MHz. 1ms simulation is carried out to get 4096 points. I've also set strobe period and strobe delay to Ts=1/fs and Ts/2-epsilon, respectively.

When I use the liberal mode, I get what I expect BUT when I switch to moderate mode the performance goes down and I cannot figure out what the reason is.  :o
Please check out both PSDs in liberal and moderate modes.

Thanks
Back to top
 

psd_liberal.png
View Profile   IP Logged
polyam
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 78

Re: discrepancy between liberal and moderate in the simulation of a SC delta sigma
Reply #1 - Dec 24th, 2017, 5:55pm
 
PSD moderate
Back to top
 

psd_moderate.png
View Profile   IP Logged
sheldon
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 751

Re: Discrepancy between liberal and moderate in the simulation of a SC delta sigma
Reply #2 - Dec 27th, 2017, 10:10am
 
Polyam,

  These results are the FFT results, not the PSD. You will need to use a
different simulation setup, run  longer simulation, and use a different
measurement to perform a PSD.

  These results are expected and correct. The moderate error preset
has higher simulation accuracy tolerances than the liberal error preset.
The moderate error preset results are showing the noise shaping of the
quantization noise.

   Try running a 16,384 point FFT with the moderate error preset. In
that case, the quantization noise floor should be ~6dB lower for the
16384 point FFT.

                                                                               Sheldon
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.