The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 26th, 2024, 4:31pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
iip3 simulation vs. calculation (Read 2578 times)
YYou
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 13

iip3 simulation vs. calculation
Mar 03rd, 2015, 1:13pm
 
Hello,

I am simulating a chain with mixer + PA driver. I simulated voltage gain and IIP3 for mixer and PA driver, respectively.
Then I connected them together, and simulated the whole chain.  The IIP3 is about 5 dB lower than that calculated using cascaded IIP3 equation.
I tried to figure out why, but no luck.
Does someone have any suggestions ? Did I miss sth. ?

BTW, the cascaded IIP3 calculation should be correct. I used them before to do sth. similar. Proved good.

Thank you.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: iip3 simulation vs. calculation
Reply #1 - Mar 4th, 2015, 7:08am
 
Hi,


just FYI, the cascaded IIP3 equation is a worst case calculation. It only works when the phases of the IM3 and fundamental components line up nicely. This is obviously not the source of your problem however as your simulated IIP3 is worse than what was calculated. I think you need to provide more information. For example, are you sure it isn't a loading issue? Does the curve look well behaved? How did you simulate individual IIP3? In order to be accurate, you need to use the correct source/load impedances for the individual blocks.

You could do an ideal simulation where you cascade the blocks, and then probe the internal node in between the blocks and check the IIP3 of the mixer. For the PA driver, you could inject the input signal at the internal input node while the system is still cascaded.


regards,
Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
totowo
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 13
SH, PRC
Re: iip3 simulation vs. calculation
Reply #2 - Mar 12th, 2015, 12:45am
 
There may be two reason:
1. the load impedance (PA as load of mixer) is not constant but a function of frequency.
IM3 production depends on  not only the impedance at fundamental frequency, but also impedance at f1-f2, f1+f2, 2f1, 2f2.

2. Besides 3rd nonlinearity, 5th nonlinearity could also generate IM3. PA always shows a strong nonlinearity.

Simply caculation ignore these effects.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile totowo totowo   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.