The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 24th, 2024, 3:14am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Degradation of SNR due to LO Phase Noise (Read 3180 times)
rf_noobie
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 1

Degradation of SNR due to LO Phase Noise
Jul 21st, 2014, 4:58pm
 
Hello,

I was wondering if someone could direct me to an analysis of the impact of LO phase noise on the degradation of mixer NF. This is for a BFSK receiver, so naturally phase noise will directly reduce BER just because of smearing of the two tones. Assuming no interferers, I think it should also reduce input sensitivity, but I'm not sure how the phase noise "turns into" signal path amplitude noise. It would be nice if there was an expression like:

NF_mixer = NF_mixer_perfect_LO + f(rms_jitter)

Preliminary simulations suggest that it has an enormous impact on the NF - nearly a 25dB difference between perfect LO and an 'actual' LO - but I cannot think of a good way to analytically quantify it to determine how good the jitter needs to be to meet receiver specs.

The closest things that I have found so far are reciprocal mixing (which seems kind of obvious - I'm trying to find an expression w/out an interferer) and SNR degradation in a sample+hold circuit. The second case would be perfect, but because LO and RF are of a similar frequency, there will be aliasing so saying that S/N = (1/2πσf)^2 is not correct... I think.

The answer is probably right in front of me but I don't seem to be looking for the right thing. Any help is appreciated, thanks!
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
RFICDUDE
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 323

Re: Degradation of SNR due to LO Phase Noise
Reply #1 - Jul 21st, 2014, 6:21pm
 
Reciprocal mixing is the way I think about it. Any noise on the LO signal prior to the mixer will be multiplied with the mixer input signal.

Sensitivity degradation: the noise level would have to be very large because you are multiplying a small signal (input) with another small signal (LO noise). The resulting noise from a dBc point of view will be below the small desired signal by the same amount it is below the LO signal (dBc). So, unless your LO noise is <30dBc it probably isn't a sensitivity (NF) problem.

Blocking SNR degradation is a real issue as a large blocker will be multiplied by the LO and the noise will have the same dBc relationship on the big blocker. You just need to know the blocker level, the dBc LO noise at the desired channel offset to the blocker and then integrate the noise over the desired channel and add it into the thermal noise (in power).

Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
aaron_do
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1398

Re: Degradation of SNR due to LO Phase Noise
Reply #2 - Jul 21st, 2014, 6:54pm
 
Hi,


These are just my own educated guesses, so read at your own risk Cheesy.

I think the LO phase noise will directly add to the phase noise of the output signal. But for the SNR, it would depend on the signal itself. In your case, since you are using a frequency modulation, you need to see the effect of the phase noise on the output frequency. Following this,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_modulation

I guess you can say the signal phase without the carrier is equal to 2πΔf∫x(τ)dτ + φn(t). So that would make the signal frequency equal to 2πΔfx(t) + d/dt[φn(t)]. So if I were doing the calculation without having read a book on communications theory, I would get my frequency domain phase noise plot, and multiply by 2πf, then integrate over frequency to get the noise power. I guess the signal power would simply be (2πΔf)2.

Probably a book on communications theory would give you a better answer.


Aaron
Back to top
 
 

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla
View Profile   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.