The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 26th, 2024, 7:48am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier? (Read 3357 times)
mixed_signal
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 183

Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Apr 22nd, 2014, 7:19am
 
Hi ,

Which biasing will be more noisier?
Resistor biasing using a potentiometer (acting as current source)
External Keithley low noise source.

Since resistor is passive , it should be low noise than keithley, right?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Reply #1 - Apr 22nd, 2014, 3:32pm
 
A current source is always noisy due to high impedance characteristics.

You want ultra low noise? Use a battery.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
mixed_signal
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 183

Re: Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Reply #2 - Apr 22nd, 2014, 9:36pm
 
Hi loose-electron,

You mean resistor for biasing source and battery for Vdd?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Reply #3 - Apr 23rd, 2014, 2:56pm
 
back when I was characterizing some ultra low noise things, we found that using a battery as the power source, and fixed resistor dividers with filter capacitance got it done.

Resistors/Temperature low enough in value that thermal noise did not rise up, and the capacitor such that the BW was like 0.01Hz or something similar.

We were looking at flicker noise at the time and we could actually see the transitions associated with single electrons from a CMOS amplifier. Smiley

Neat stuff, electricity is discrete units of charge if you look close enough.  8-)

Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
mixed_signal
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 183

Re: Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Reply #4 - Apr 23rd, 2014, 9:48pm
 
Hi loose electron,

Honestly speaking it is my dream to have that experience of observing noise from a single electron. I shall definitely try and let you know .

I want to bias a baseband buffer (30MHz) at the end of a receiver. The buffer is a source follower to drive 50 ohm. I want to use attached biasing network. I dont want to use resistive voltage divider because MOS threshold may vary and cause problems in onchip implementation. Do you agree? is my scheme ok?

Back to top
 

Bias2.jpg
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Keithley low noise source vs potentiometer bias: Noisier?
Reply #5 - Apr 24th, 2014, 4:15pm
 
should work, but I expect the main source of noise in Vout is the active load (NMOS current source) used in the output amplifier.

Do some noise simulations and determine what your noise source are.

Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.