The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Mar 28th, 2024, 5:27am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Regarding Serial Link standrds (Read 1430 times)
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Regarding Serial Link standrds
Nov 21st, 2013, 11:40am
 
Dear All,

1.Why some standards specify external AC coupling (between TX and RX), some others use Direct coupling, i know from RX design Ac coupling will be useful but i guess there will be a strong reason from Board point of view.

2.Why always TX eye mask will be different than RX mask (actually i don't know how to describe here, TX mask will rectangular,RX will be like rambus shape)

Thanks,
Raj.

Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
harpoon
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 112
Hampshire
Re: Regarding Serial Link standrds
Reply #1 - Nov 25th, 2013, 7:09am
 
raja.cedt wrote on Nov 21st, 2013, 11:40am:
2.Why always TX eye mask will be different than RX mask (actually i don't know how to describe here, TX mask will rectangular,RX will be like rambus shape)



I have designed a transceiver for USB in the past and the TX is rectangular because it needs to be as perfect as it can be before going into the "channel" (in my case, pins, board, connectors and a long USB cable with reflections and mismatches).

The RX pattern that the chip needs to be able to detect will therefore be non-ideal (i.e. rambus shaped), i.e. a very small eye opening. This is due to the imperfections in the "channel" mentioned above.

Depending on where you measure/define your "channel" / system, the TX/RX eye templates will be different (getting worse going from TX to RX)

Was that what you were asking ?
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
hxwang
New Member
*
Offline



Posts: 1

Re: Regarding Serial Link standrds
Reply #2 - Apr 1st, 2015, 9:45pm
 
DC or AC couple?
If with DC couple, the TX sets the CM voltage. Then the CM range may be large for the RX considering the nonideal effects induced by the channel/cable etc.
If with AC couple, this problem is non-exist. But it throws some requirments on the data.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
loose-electron
Senior Fellow
******
Offline

Best Design Tool =
Capable Designers

Posts: 1638
San Diego California
Re: Regarding Serial Link standrds
Reply #3 - Nov 16th, 2015, 4:42pm
 
hxwang wrote on Apr 1st, 2015, 9:45pm:
DC or AC couple?
If with DC couple, the TX sets the CM voltage. Then the CM range may be large for the RX considering the nonideal effects induced by the channel/cable etc.
If with AC couple, this problem is non-exist. But it throws some requirments on the data.


Agreed - AC coupling dictates some form of run length limited coding structure so that the BW range of the signal is limited on the LF end. DC coupling can tolerate simple binary data but then has to signal process situatiosn with long strings of 1 or 0 which can be difficult.
Back to top
 
 

Jerry Twomey
www.effectiveelectrons.com
Read My Electronic Design Column Here
Contract IC-PCB-System Design - Analog, Mixed Signal, RF & Medical
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
Venky_analog
Junior Member
**
Offline

Analog Design is my
trade. Math is my
love.

Posts: 10
TX, USA
Re: Regarding Serial Link standrds
Reply #4 - Nov 18th, 2015, 7:45pm
 
Hi,

1) When we have a channel that is ac coupled, TX won't set the common mode voltage (or the dc bias) at the RX. RX can set its own common mode voltage. This helps us in several ways. If you want an NMOS input pair for the diff amp at RX, you would rather want a high common mode voltage so that all transistors in the diff amp are in proper saturation. Similarly, if you are planning for a PMOS input pair for the diff amp, you would rather want a low common mode voltage. If TX places some constraints on this common mode level, you won't have the freedom to choose the type of transistor. There are several other reasons in addition to the above mentioned one.

2) For the second question, I believe what you are talking about is the reduction in eye opening (both horizontal and vertical) at the RX. This has something to do with Inter-symbol Interference (ISI) that occurs because of increase in channel attenuation with frequency, and you also have other jitter components in addition. There are lots of materials on ISI online.

Hope this helps.
Back to top
 
 

Either die a white noise or live long enough to see yourself become the 1/f noise.
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: Regarding Serial Link standrds
Reply #5 - Nov 19th, 2015, 12:33am
 
Dear all---thanks for your replies. Few additional points---

1. Dc-oupling mandates same ground potential always at Tx and RX, which is not easy always (especially in case of long trace or server based applications in which each rack PCB separated by long vertical trace)

2. Some times, TX is cmos and RX could be bipolar (in case of 100G optical chips), so TX side 1V and RX side 3.3V(typical). In this case Ac coupling is the only one solution.

Thanks,
Raj.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.