The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
May 6th, 2024, 5:05pm
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
question on stability (Read 7017 times)
circuit_cook
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 25

question on stability
May 05th, 2009, 7:44am
 
Hi, everyone:

   I am a little loss at the control theory.
It says a system is stable if it has all poles in the left half plane. But if an opamp in closed loop has three poles (all in the left plane), we say it is unstable, because PM is negative.
  Is the stability mean different thing here? Or does it mean that the stability criterion means that if compensation can be applied to achieve stability, it still meets the criterion?

Judy
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
buddypoor
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 529
Bremen, Germany
Re: question on stability
Reply #1 - May 5th, 2009, 8:08am
 
circuit_cook wrote on May 5th, 2009, 7:44am:
Hi, everyone:

   I am a little loss at the control theory.
It says a system is stable if it has all poles in the left half plane. But if an opamp in closed loop has three poles (all in the left plane), we say it is unstable, because PM is negative.
  Is the stability mean different thing here? Or does it mean that the stability criterion means that if compensation can be applied to achieve stability, it still meets the criterion?
Judy


Who has said that a closed loop opamp with 3 poles in the LHP has negative PM and is unstable ? This is not the case !
Or did I understand something wrong in your question ?
Back to top
 
 

LvW (buddypoor: In memory of the great late Buddy Rich)
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: question on stability
Reply #2 - May 5th, 2009, 8:55am
 
hi Judy,
          if the poles are in RHP then system is unstable,but if they are in LHP still there is a chance of unstable because it is necessary but not sufficient.Now come to 3 stage op amp,in this case based on poles location you have to decide whether it is stable or not,but most of the times you will get less phase margin(>30) so it wont give satisfactory transient response.

Hope this is useful.

Thanks,
Rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
circuit_cook
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 25

Re: question on stability
Reply #3 - May 5th, 2009, 9:22am
 
Hi buddypoor:

   I mean a open loop opamp with three left half plane poles before UGB, a limit is on the feedback factor fo it to be stable. Is that anything wrong in my question?

   I kind of have the same thought as Raja, that all left half plane poles is a necessary but not always sufficient condition for stability.
 
   I read something called exponentially stability, and also there is the exponentially uniform stability, but too much math for me to get through it all now. So I wonder if the stability we acheive with Bode plot for enough PM margin is a subset of the more broader stability of BIBO. For BIBO the left half plane criterion suffice. For the subset the condition is more stringent?

    This question has some similarity to Pancho's question about a system that is stable in Nyquist plot (conditionally stable), but why the 180 phase shift doesn't matter.
   
    Does that comes from Bode plot is only an engineering aid to design, and Nyquist is the golden rule?


Judy
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: question on stability
Reply #4 - May 5th, 2009, 9:25am
 
circuit_cook wrote on May 5th, 2009, 7:44am:
It says a system is stable if it has all poles in the left half plane.
But if an opamp in closed loop has three poles (all in the left plane), we say it is unstable, because PM is negative.
Do you understand open-loop gain, closed-loop gain, GM and PM correctly ?

If no RHP pole in your closed loop gain is achieved by pole-zero cancellation, you have to consider internal stability.
Especially during startup of system or circuits, each block have time difference to reach steady state.
So RHP poles could not be canceled by RHP zeros during startup of system or circuits.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: May 5th, 2009, 11:39pm by pancho_hideboo »  
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
circuit_cook
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 25

Re: question on stability
Reply #5 - May 5th, 2009, 9:34am
 
Hi, Pancho:

     Thanks, I mixed it up. the closed loop pole would move to RHP when unstable. the criterion is right.


Judy
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: question on stability
Reply #6 - May 5th, 2009, 10:02am
 
hi Judy,
          i think you need some minimum basics on stability.
1.For an open loop system to be stable you should have all LHP poles,otherwise system wont converge for steady input(This is called BIBO stability). In real working analog circuit you will not see RHP poles may be RHP zero(this is what i observed from my exp)
2.For an closed loop now poles will move with feedback, so as to examine the stability bode plot will help (this will take open loop information and feedback factor) otherwise if you are able to find you can roots then no need of bode plot.
3.But in circuits we wont consider BIBO stability because even though it is unstable you may limited by power supply or active device non linearity, so the main concern here is how good step response (this will come from the phase margin)  
4.Bode plot is exact in case of all pole system,if zero's are then use nyquist.........use this document..very clear one.
http://www.ee.iitm.ac.in/~nagendra/presentations/20090109vlsiconf/20090109vlsico...

hi pancho_hideboo,
                           from your previous ans i got this doubt, is it possible to cancel RH pole?could you please..i think answer is no.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: question on stability
Reply #7 - May 5th, 2009, 10:14am
 
raja.cedt wrote on May 5th, 2009, 10:02am:
hi pancho_hideboo, from your previous ans i got this doubt, is it possible to cancel RH pole?could you please..i think answer is no.
Not correct.
We can set zeros in RHP.
For example, assume 2nd order allpass system function which have two zeros in RHP and two poles in LHP.
Back to top
 
« Last Edit: May 5th, 2009, 11:49am by pancho_hideboo »  
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
raja.cedt
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1516
Germany
Re: question on stability
Reply #8 - May 5th, 2009, 10:23am
 
hi pancho_hideboo,
                           ya but is it canceling there?in the magnitude point of view it is canceling,but from phase point of view how it is not canceling?Please don't mind if my concepts are clear.Thanks for spending time.

Thanks,
Rajasekhar.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW raja.sekhar86   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: question on stability
Reply #9 - May 5th, 2009, 10:36am
 
raja.cedt wrote on May 5th, 2009, 10:23am:
hi pancho_hideboo, ya but is it canceling there?
in the magnitude point of view it is canceling,
but from phase point of view how it is not canceling?
See text books on control system theory.

The followings might be a little helpful.
http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~caggweb/Analog/hw5.pdf
http://www.engin.umich.edu/group/ctm/extras/PZ.html

Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.