The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines.
Apr 20th, 2024, 12:20am
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
What is actually "beat frequency" (Read 1387 times)
DoYouLinux
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 80

What is actually "beat frequency"
Jan 15th, 2009, 8:14am
 
Hi all,

Well, it may seem strange asking this question, perhaps you all know about this. However, it seems strange to me.  :o

What is a beat frequency, as we can see from PSS SpectreRF sim ?

When I have 1 GHz and 900 MHz, it is equal to 100 MHz,

but when I have 1 GHz and 920 MHz, it is equal to 40 MHz ???

It is not equal to the difference between the two frequencies in all cases  :-/

Thank you so much again,

DYL
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
Frank Wiedmann
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 677
Munich, Germany
Re: What is actually "beat frequency"
Reply #1 - Jan 15th, 2009, 8:28am
 
See http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1224609785/5#5. 40 MHz divides both 1 GHz and 920 MHz, 80 MHz does not.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW   IP Logged
ACWWong
Community Fellow
*****
Offline



Posts: 539
Oxford, UK
Re: What is actually "beat frequency"
Reply #2 - Jan 15th, 2009, 10:18am
 
yes its the "highest common divisor" frequency for the large tone frequencies in your setup (including divided down frequencies).
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
DoYouLinux
Community Member
***
Offline



Posts: 80

Re: What is actually "beat frequency"
Reply #3 - Jan 16th, 2009, 12:02am
 
Oh, thanks a lot, guys Cheesy

This helps me to be more clear on this

DYL
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1424
Real Homeless
Re: What is actually "beat frequency"
Reply #4 - Jan 17th, 2009, 6:29am
 
Your post is usage of specific EDA vendor's simulator. There is no Design issue.
Please post to "The Designer's Guide Community Forum ≫ Simulators ≫ RF Simulators".

DoYouLinux wrote on Jan 15th, 2009, 8:14am:
What is a beat frequency, as we can see from PSS SpectreRF sim ?

There is no "beat" in analysis statement. Also see "spectre -h pss".
You should not use term "beat" in PSS setting. Expression of "beat" is not proper.
Fundamental frequency of PSS is not beat frequency.
I can't understand why Cadence has kept to use this expression of "beat" in PSS's setting UI.
Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Copyright 2002-2024 Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. Designer’s Guide® is a registered trademark of Designer’s Guide Consulting, Inc. All rights reserved. Send comments or questions to editor@designers-guide.org. Consider submitting a paper or model.