Designer’s Guide Community

aaron_do

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1398

limiting amplifier gain
May 06^th, 2008, 1:20am

Hi all,

for constant envelope modulation schemes, we can use a limiting amplifier before demodulation to set the signal level. These limiting amplifiers are sometimes staged to get an RSSI at the same time. In order to prevent too much distortion, you need to filter the signal first using a channel filter.

Anyway i've noticed some schemes having limiting amplifiers with over 80 dB gain. The amplifiers are operated in an open loop so linearity is poor. Anyway their job is basically to compress the signal so their intermodulation is bound to be high especially when the signal is large. My question is basically "will this matter"? I understand the channel filter will ease the requirements of the limiter linearity, but with 80 dB gain, you would need an enormous out-of-band rejection in the channel filter....

thanks for any help,
Aaron

Back to top

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla

IP Logged

pancho_hideboo

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1424
Real Homeless

Re: limiting amplifier gain
Reply #1 - May 6^th, 2008, 1:58am

aaron_do wrote on May 6^th, 2008, 1:20am:

The amplifiers are operated in an open loop so linearity is poor. Anyway their job is basically to compress the signal so their intermodulation is bound to be high especially when the signal is large. My question is basically "will this matter"?

As far as limiter is well designed, limiter produces only odd order harmonics of carrier.
If an input envelope to limiter is already constant, a main lobe of spectrum around carrier will not spread even after limiter.

Although actually limiter produces even order harmonics, you can suppress this with careful design.
If an input envelope to limiter is not constant, a spectrum around carrier after limiter will spread.
But after band limiting by channel selection filter, it comes to have envelope fluctuation again.

Anyway if limiter is well designed, it never causes unrecoverable distortion as far as there is no large interference input to limiter.

aaron_do wrote on May 6^th, 2008, 1:20am:

I understand the channel filter will ease the requirements of the limiter linearity, but with 80 dB gain, you would need an enormous out-of-band rejection in the channel filter....

Large rejections are required at higher order harmonics frequency.

In attached figure, �an input envelope to limiter is already constant, a main lobe of spectrum around carrier will not spread even after limiter.

Back to top

limiter.jpg

« Last Edit: May 6^th, 2008, 8:16am by pancho_hideboo »

Kita━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!!
http://www7.plala.or.jp/ungeromeppa/flash/kita.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjIxGh55bMM&feature=related

IP Logged

pancho_hideboo

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1424
Real Homeless

Re: limiting amplifier gain
Reply #2 - May 6^th, 2008, 2:13am

AM/AM and AM/PM characteristics of Limiter.

BTW I couldn't apply Cadence's SpectreRF in evaluation of this. Angry

http://www.designers-guide.org/Forum/YaBB.pl?num=1162921214/0#0

It might be possible to evaluate this if current SpectreRF is used.
Maybe simulation speed must be very very very slow.
Anyway I will not use Cadence's SpectreRF. Tongue

8-)

Back to top

limiter2.jpg

« Last Edit: May 6^th, 2008, 8:21am by pancho_hideboo »

Kita━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!!
http://www7.plala.or.jp/ungeromeppa/flash/kita.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjIxGh55bMM&feature=related

IP Logged

Ken Kundert

Global Moderator

Offline

Posts: 2384
Silicon Valley

Re: limiting amplifier gain
Reply #3 - May 6^th, 2008, 4:32pm

I have used SpectreRF to examine the AM/PM characteristics of limiter, and it has worked great, and I have had no trouble with the speed.

I have found that people often have trouble with SpectreRF because they tighten the tolerances when they don't need to. My experience is that the default tolerances are generally work really well, and I rarely have to use anything but the defaults.

Perhaps you are being too conservative in your use of tolerances.

-Ken

Back to top

IP Logged

pancho_hideboo

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1424
Real Homeless

Re: limiting amplifier gain
Reply #4 - May 6^th, 2008, 5:20pm

Ken Kundert wrote on May 6^th, 2008, 4:32pm:

Perhaps you are being too conservative in your use of tolerances.
-Ken

No, my accuracy setting is not so tight. That is "errpreset=moderate".

SpectreRF can work for simple gentle circuits.

My log envelope detector circuit(RSSI) is composed of limiter, rectifier, bias etc.
Circuit size is fairly large. So it takes much time even for DC analysis.
SpectreRF is not robust at all for such large actual circuits on the contrary to Cadence Advertisement.

I have various simulators working on Cadence ADE.
So I don't have to insist on using SpectreRF at all.

Back to top

Kita━━━━━━(ﾟ∀ﾟ)━━━━━━ !!!!!
http://www7.plala.or.jp/ungeromeppa/flash/kita.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjIxGh55bMM&feature=related

IP Logged

Ken Kundert Global Moderator Offline Posts: 2384 Silicon Valley	Re: limiting amplifier gain Reply #5 - May 6^th, 2008, 10:44pm That has not been my experience. I have found it to be quite robust. -Ken
Back to top	IP Logged

aaron_do

Senior Fellow

Offline

Posts: 1398

Re: limiting amplifier gain
Reply #6 - May 8^th, 2008, 12:02am

Hi pancho_hideboo,

thanks for your reply. Could you tell me what simulation you ran to get the envelope before and after limiting. It seems to be a transient analysis, but how did you get the frequency spectrum? Usually i use dft, but i'm sure it can't get that many points...Also did you use transient noise? Any tips on how to set the parameters?

Last question...you showed the AM/AM and AM/PM characteristics for three harmonics. Isn't the 1st harmonic enough?

thanks,
Aaron

Back to top

there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment - Nikola Tesla

IP Logged