The Designer's Guide Community
Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register. Please follow the Forum guidelines. Feb 8th, 2010, 8:51pm
  HomeHelpSearchLoginRegisterPM to admin  
 
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
noise simulation of the mixer (Read 955 times)
nxing
Junior Member
**
Offline

God help the person
who help themselves

Posts: 31
China
noise simulation of the mixer
Jul 10th, 2007, 4:54pm
 
Hi there,

I have a question about the noise simulation, from the Cadence tutorial, there are three ways to simulate the mixers NF: PNOISE with a DC input at RF port, the PSP following a PSS and QPNOISE following QPSS. I am wondering which one is more accurate? Even from the tutorial, I can see that the simulation results from the former two are different.

Thanks

nxing
Back to top
 
 
View Profile   IP Logged
pancho_hideboo
Senior Fellow
******
Offline



Posts: 1035
Real Homeless
Re: noise simulation of the mixer
Reply #1 - Jul 12th, 2007, 10:47pm
 
Hi.

If you simply evaluate NF of mixer in same situation as using actual instruments such as
Agilent N8975A NFA Series Noise Figure Analyzer or 8970A,
use PSS/Pnoise or PSS/PSP with DC input as RF input where only LO is large signal.
In this case both PSS/Pnoise and PSS/PSP give you same results unless you set wrong setting in simulation.

If you study an effect of NF degradation due to RF compression or desentitization,
use QPSS/QPnoise or QPSS/QPSP with large RF input.



Back to top
 
 
View Profile WWW Top+Secret Top+Secret   IP Logged
Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Trouble viewing this site? Copyright © 2002-2009 Designer's Guide Consulting. 'Designer's Guide' is a registered trademark of Designer's Guide LLC. All rights reserved.
Give back to the Designer's Guide Community by shopping at Amazon. Purchasing products through this link helps to fund our activities and does not increase your cost.