Forum
Forum
Verilog-AMS
Analysis
Modeling
Design
Theory
Books
Welcome, Guest. Please
Login
or
Register.
Please follow the Forum
guidelines
.
Sep 8
th
, 2010, 1:28am
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
PM to admin
The Designer's Guide Community Forum
›
Measurements
›
Other Measurements
› Average Power Vs. RMS power
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Pages: 1
Average Power Vs. RMS power (Read 2692 times)
crhu
Junior Member
Offline
I come, I see, and I
go
Posts: 11
Average Power Vs. RMS power
Dec 22
nd
, 2004, 11:11pm
Hi, forum,
I am wondering what is the criteria to use average power
or RMS power in power simulation.
Acordingt to Poynting's theorem, Sav=Re(EXH), average
power should be enough for power measurement all the EM field.
However, I find that there are many places, esp. in RF ckt, RMS power
is used instead.
Any inputs are highly appreciated.
Thanks.
--crhu
Back to top
IP Logged
Ken Kundert
Global Moderator
Offline
The Spectre
Posts: 1442
San Jose
Re: Average Power Vs. RMS power
Reply #1 -
Dec 27
th
, 2004, 1:13pm
Charlie,
Average and RMS power are the same, are they not?
The equation you gave for Poynting's theorem assumed the use of phasors, which assumes sinusoidal signals. When using RMS you are allowing signals other than sinusoids to be used.
-Ken
Back to top
IP Logged
crhu
Junior Member
Offline
I come, I see, and I
go
Posts: 11
Re: Average Power Vs. RMS power
Reply #2 -
Dec 27
th
, 2004, 5:58pm
Hi, forum,
I googled "RMS average power" and here is something
giving me some hints:
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sullivan/techniques.pdf
"More generally only components of v(t) and i(t) at
the same frequency contribute to average power"
If it is true ( I do not know how to derive it yet),
average power can not characterize the power for
non-linear circuit. Am I right?
Thanks.
--Charlie
Back to top
IP Logged
crhu
Junior Member
Offline
I come, I see, and I
go
Posts: 11
Re: Average Power Vs. RMS power
Reply #3 -
Dec 28
th
, 2004, 2:02pm
Hi, Ken,
I went through the Poyting's Therom one more time, and
you are right that the Saverage = Re(SXconjugate(H)) is
in the format of phasor. As any periodic inputs can be decomposed into sinusoids of different frequency, the
Therom should be able to apply to all the periodic/quasi-
periodic inputs.
I do think right now that there is a hidden assumption in
Poynting's Therom: the changing E field only generates
the M field with the same frequency; so does the changing
M field, as the linear, homogeous medium is assumed.
So, seems to me that the average power is not a good
enough measurement for a non-linear system.
Thanks.
--Charlie
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous topic
|
Next topic
›
Forum Jump »
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Design
- RF Design
- Analog Design
- Mixed-Signal Design
- High-Speed I/O Design
- High-Power Design
- Mixed-Technology Design
Analog Verification
- Analog Functional Verification
- Analog Performance Verification
Measurements
- RF Measurements
- Phase Noise and Jitter Measurements
»» Other Measurements
Modeling
- Semiconductor Devices
- Passive Devices
- Behavioral Models
- Transmission Lines and Other Distributed Devices
Design Languages
- Verilog-AMS
- VHDL-AMS
Simulators
- Circuit Simulators
- RF Simulators
- AMS Simulators
- Timing Simulators
- System Simulators
- Logic Simulators
Other CAD Tools
- Entry Tools
- Physical Verification, Extraction and Analysis
- Unmet Needs in Analog CAD
General
- Tech Talk
- News
- Comments and Suggestions
- Opportunities
« Home
‹ Board
The Designer's Guide Community Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.2.2
!
YaBB
© 2000-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Opportunities
What's New
Links
Experts
Perspective
Submissions
Calculator
Trouble viewing this site?
Copyright © 2002-2009
Designer's Guide Consulting
. '
Designer's Guide' is a registered trademark of Designer's Guide LLC. All rights reserved.
Community
Web
Advertise on this site.
Give back to the Designer's Guide Community by shopping at
Amazon
. Purchasing products through this link helps to fund our activities and does not increase your cost.